<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.palamida.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Palamida - Legal</title>
 <link>http://www.palamida.com/taxonomy/term/8/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>If a License Falls in the Woods...</title>
 <link>http://www.palamida.com/node/511</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...And it was vague or unintelligible, would it still be enforceable?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palamida.com/node/511&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.palamida.com/node/511#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.palamida.com/taxonomy/term/8">Legal</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:58:37 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">511 at http://www.palamida.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When Legal Advice Isn&#039;t Enough</title>
 <link>http://www.palamida.com/node/477</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Last week, ZDNet posted a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6207502.html?tag=nl.e019&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; news item &lt;/a&gt; on the Linux Foundation&#039;s upcoming Legal Summit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palamida.com/node/477&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.palamida.com/node/477#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.palamida.com/taxonomy/term/8">Legal</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:11:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">477 at http://www.palamida.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>GPL 3.0</title>
 <link>http://www.palamida.com/node/205</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The long-awaited 3.0 version of the GPL will be presented in draft form soon. In our world that is a major event, since it is this license (and its cousin the LGPL) that have been the cornerstone of much of the IP theory and practice in the open source world. Steve Shankland has a good summary &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Overhaul+of+GPL+set+for+public+release/2100-7344_3-6025310.html?tag=nefd.lede&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For everyone in this area, it will be important to understand the direction that the FSF is taking and comment as appropriate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.palamida.com/node/205#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.palamida.com/taxonomy/term/8">Legal</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">205 at http://www.palamida.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Insurance?</title>
 <link>http://www.palamida.com/node/211</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is an interesting direction underway, as exemplified by the OSRM &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=281CAAA4-BFDC-48BC-8E9C-127A994D9FC3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt; yesterday regarding open source insurance. This article has more information, but the net is that users of open source software can now purchase insurance which will pay them for costs incurred when they are inadvertantly out of compliance with open source licensing terms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palamida.com/node/211&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.palamida.com/node/211#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.palamida.com/taxonomy/term/8">Legal</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 02:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">211 at http://www.palamida.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
